Dear all,
actually, I had a similar question last week and I'm quite happy there is some discussion about that.
However, as this is really a basic issue of physical oceanography, I assume there are other posts concerning this topic, which I might have missed.
My comment is more a fundamental one ...
Search found 6 matches
- Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:06 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Calculation of Geostrophic Current
- Replies: 3
- Views: 19065
- Thu Oct 26, 2017 8:07 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: ROMS tidal forcing with water elevation ONLY
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11213
Re: ROMS tidal forcing with water elevation ONLY
Dear all,
we saw also this behaviour of blowing-ups when only using tidal boundary conditions and reduced 2d momentum conditions.
Usually, I use a dirty trick to reduce the instabilities. It is a kind of damping, which was also introduced into FVCOM to stabilize the model at open boundaries.
It ...
we saw also this behaviour of blowing-ups when only using tidal boundary conditions and reduced 2d momentum conditions.
Usually, I use a dirty trick to reduce the instabilities. It is a kind of damping, which was also introduced into FVCOM to stabilize the model at open boundaries.
It ...
- Wed Oct 11, 2017 1:40 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: two-way nesting with wet-dry treatment
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2467
two-way nesting with wet-dry treatment
Dear all,
I hope I did not miss the answer to the following question inside the forum.
We are using two-way nesting for tidal-flat applications.
When comparing the free surface in coarse and fine grid within the same region, one can see a difference in dry areas. Whereas in fine grid, zeta meets ...
I hope I did not miss the answer to the following question inside the forum.
We are using two-way nesting for tidal-flat applications.
When comparing the free surface in coarse and fine grid within the same region, one can see a difference in dry areas. Whereas in fine grid, zeta meets ...
- Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:40 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: ROMS-SWAN coupling, nearshore_MELLOR08 : Segmentation fault
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3763
Re: ROMS-SWAN coupling, nearshore_MELLOR08 : Segmentation fa
Dear all,
in the meantime I checked this issue on another computer platform with a newer version of the intel fortan compiler.
Using the compiler version:
Intel(R) Fortran Compiler XE for applications running on IA-32, Version 12.1.4.319 Build 20120410
The segmenttion fault does not appear any ...
in the meantime I checked this issue on another computer platform with a newer version of the intel fortan compiler.
Using the compiler version:
Intel(R) Fortran Compiler XE for applications running on IA-32, Version 12.1.4.319 Build 20120410
The segmenttion fault does not appear any ...
- Fri Nov 07, 2014 10:00 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: ROMS-SWAN coupling, nearshore_MELLOR08 : Segmentation fault
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3763
Re: ROMS-SWAN coupling, nearshore_MELLOR08 : Segmentation fa
Dear John Warner,
thanks very much for your answer and offer.
I really would like to check the COAWST code as well.
In the meantime, I found a quick solution to the original problem which is working but is still quite strange.
The source of the error seems to come from several lines above when ...
thanks very much for your answer and offer.
I really would like to check the COAWST code as well.
In the meantime, I found a quick solution to the original problem which is working but is still quite strange.
The source of the error seems to come from several lines above when ...
- Thu Nov 06, 2014 3:33 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: ROMS-SWAN coupling, nearshore_MELLOR08 : Segmentation fault
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3763
ROMS-SWAN coupling, nearshore_MELLOR08 : Segmentation fault
Dear all,
I started using the ROMS-SWAN coupling with the inlet test case.
I could successfully compile and run the model with the nearshore_MELLOR05 option.
Then I changed to the NEARSHORE_MELLOR08 option for calculating the radiation stresses.
When running the model on 2CPU's I got a ...
I started using the ROMS-SWAN coupling with the inlet test case.
I could successfully compile and run the model with the nearshore_MELLOR05 option.
Then I changed to the NEARSHORE_MELLOR08 option for calculating the radiation stresses.
When running the model on 2CPU's I got a ...