Hi:
Thank you for your valuable comments and document.
of the velocity field to du/dz = sustr/Akv at the free surface. This is the only natural physical boundary condition, provided that
(1) Akv remains finite at surface; and
(2) the vertical profile of u (Ekman spiral or whatever) is adequately ...
Search found 8 matches
- Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:34 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: a possible improvement of the spline vertical viscosity
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4135
- Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:41 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: a possible improvement of the spline vertical viscosity
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4135
a possible improvement of the spline vertical viscosity
Hi:
I have a question about the spline interpolation used to get the stress by the vertical viscosity in step3d_uv.F. I guess that derivatives at the boundary (or alternatives) should be prescribed in the spline interpolation. What kind of the boundary condition is assumed in ROMS? It seems to me ...
I have a question about the spline interpolation used to get the stress by the vertical viscosity in step3d_uv.F. I guess that derivatives at the boundary (or alternatives) should be prescribed in the spline interpolation. What kind of the boundary condition is assumed in ROMS? It seems to me ...
- Mon May 07, 2007 2:32 am
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Negative passive tracer concentration
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7606
- Fri Dec 02, 2005 3:04 am
- Forum: ROMS Benchmarks
- Topic: Benchmarks
- Replies: 31
- Views: 106681
This is not a direct answer but I wonder if this may be some hint for someone else. How does the commercial Intel Fortran compiler use CPUs? In my understanding one Xeon processor has two CPUs in it (is this correct?). In our HITACHI's machine which is an extreme example 1x1 tiling always gives the ...
- Fri Nov 11, 2005 11:15 am
- Forum: ROMS Benchmarks
- Topic: Benchmarks
- Replies: 31
- Views: 106681
Thank you Mark. I learned another new thing. What is regarded as a bad example of programing in Fortran 77 is not so in Fortran 90. If I change the 2D kernel program of ROMS2x so that it uses older technique for work arrays, I may be able to get better performance in HITACHI's compiler. Let me try ...
- Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Benchmarks
- Topic: Benchmarks
- Replies: 31
- Views: 106681
- Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:36 pm
- Forum: ROMS Benchmarks
- Topic: Benchmarks
- Replies: 31
- Views: 106681
- Fri Oct 14, 2005 3:17 am
- Forum: ROMS Benchmarks
- Topic: Benchmarks
- Replies: 31
- Views: 106681
old compiler problem
Hi.
I remember what Mark Hadfield wrote long time ago related with benchmark tests. ROMS2.x can be much slower than 1.8 on some "old" compilers due to implicit-shape of dummy arguments in 2.x. I am still encountering this problem and using 1.8 for my research. The compiler that I am using now ...
I remember what Mark Hadfield wrote long time ago related with benchmark tests. ROMS2.x can be much slower than 1.8 on some "old" compilers due to implicit-shape of dummy arguments in 2.x. I am still encountering this problem and using 1.8 for my research. The compiler that I am using now ...