Hi Kate,
Thank you so much. I follow your advice to compare checkdefs.F with $SCRATCH_DIR/checkdefs.f90 and make sure that these are indeed not defined. I also read checkdefs.F and find out that if I want to define UV_SMAGORINSKY, I should also define UV_DIF2 or UV_DIF4. LIke wise, I should also ...
Search found 2 matches
- Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:10 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: some question about define UV_SMAGORINSKY and TP_SMAGORINSKY
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3011
- Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:19 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: some question about define UV_SMAGORINSKY and TP_SMAGORINSKY
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3011
some question about define UV_SMAGORINSKY and TP_SMAGORINSKY
dear everyone:
I'm a new user. I'm trying to find whether there really badly False diffusion in the advection. So I define UV_SMAGORINSKY, TP_SMAGORINSKY, MIX_S_UV and MIX_S_TS to do the experiment. Here is my CPP options:
# define SOLVE3D
# define UV_COR
# define UV_ADV
# define UV_QDRAG
# define ...
I'm a new user. I'm trying to find whether there really badly False diffusion in the advection. So I define UV_SMAGORINSKY, TP_SMAGORINSKY, MIX_S_UV and MIX_S_TS to do the experiment. Here is my CPP options:
# define SOLVE3D
# define UV_COR
# define UV_ADV
# define UV_QDRAG
# define ...