Kate and John: WET_DRY is definitely the path I am thinking to follow. I was just worried about it not being possible after Zafer comment.
Thanks once more.
Search found 10 matches
- Tue Jun 30, 2015 5:02 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Model blowing up using elevation at the boundary
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15612
- Tue Jun 30, 2015 4:12 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Model blowing up using elevation at the boundary
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15612
Re: Model blowing up using elevation at the boundary
Jcwarner and Wilkin - Thanks a lot for the suggestion guys. I will look into both dataset to see which one can be more suitable to my case (and thanks for the heads up on the mean sea level Wilkin) :)
Nacholibre - When you talk about bad values, do you mean NaN (not a number) values?
At some point ...
Nacholibre - When you talk about bad values, do you mean NaN (not a number) values?
At some point ...
- Fri Jun 19, 2015 5:43 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Model blowing up using elevation at the boundary
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15612
Re: Model blowing up using elevation at the boundary
Hey there John, thanks for your answer.
I thought about using Hycom because I am trying to simulate the surge caused by hurricane Sandy on Delaware Bay. When I applied just the winds and tides, the simulation fails to achieve that (in fact, instead of having an elevation in the sea surface, it ...
I thought about using Hycom because I am trying to simulate the surge caused by hurricane Sandy on Delaware Bay. When I applied just the winds and tides, the simulation fails to achieve that (in fact, instead of having an elevation in the sea surface, it ...
- Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:30 pm
- Forum: ROMS Usage
- Topic: Model blowing up using elevation at the boundary
- Replies: 12
- Views: 15612
Model blowing up using elevation at the boundary
Dear all,
I'm trying to run COAWST (coupling ROMS and SWAN) using free-surface information from HYCOM at the boundary.
In my first test, I've created a file with information just in the East boundary and it worked.
For a second test, I've created a file with information also in the North and ...
I'm trying to run COAWST (coupling ROMS and SWAN) using free-surface information from HYCOM at the boundary.
In my first test, I've created a file with information just in the East boundary and it worked.
For a second test, I've created a file with information also in the North and ...
- Mon Jun 01, 2015 3:40 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Problem using M2CLAMPED
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7158
Re: Problem using M2CLAMPED
Ok. Thanks a lot for your reply =)
- Fri May 29, 2015 7:03 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Problem using M2CLAMPED
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7158
Re: Problem using M2CLAMPED
One last questions.
Would I run into the same situation if I was putting my forcing in the East/South boundary or is this a problem specific for West/North boundary?
Would I run into the same situation if I was putting my forcing in the East/South boundary or is this a problem specific for West/North boundary?
- Fri May 29, 2015 6:50 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Problem using M2CLAMPED
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7158
Re: Problem using M2CLAMPED
Thanks a lot guys. This was very helping and enlightening. 

- Wed May 27, 2015 8:48 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Problem using M2CLAMPED
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7158
Re: Problem using M2CLAMPED
Guys,
I'm sorry, I just realized I explained my case wrongly and I didn't mention that I am using COAWST. :oops: It is actually when I force the model with the Sea Surface Elevation that I get the problem, not when forcing with the U-component of the Barotropic Flow.
That is what confused me the ...
I'm sorry, I just realized I explained my case wrongly and I didn't mention that I am using COAWST. :oops: It is actually when I force the model with the Sea Surface Elevation that I get the problem, not when forcing with the U-component of the Barotropic Flow.
That is what confused me the ...
- Tue May 26, 2015 5:04 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: Problem using M2CLAMPED
- Replies: 9
- Views: 7158
Problem using M2CLAMPED
Dear all,
I am running a test case to better understand the impact of different kinds of Boundary Conditions and found something that I cannot understand.
My scenarios are:
S1 - FSCHAPMAN - M2FLATHER
S2 - FSCHAPMAN - M2CLAMPED
S3 - FSCLAMPED - M2FLATHER
S4 - FSCLAMPED - M2CLAMPED
(Meaning I am ...
I am running a test case to better understand the impact of different kinds of Boundary Conditions and found something that I cannot understand.
My scenarios are:
S1 - FSCHAPMAN - M2FLATHER
S2 - FSCHAPMAN - M2CLAMPED
S3 - FSCLAMPED - M2FLATHER
S4 - FSCLAMPED - M2CLAMPED
(Meaning I am ...
- Tue Aug 05, 2014 7:50 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Easygrid creating grid problem
- Replies: 18
- Views: 19943
Re: Easygrid creating grid problem
Dear Vilandra
I just wanted to thank you for sharing your easygrid_v2. I was having a lot of problems trying to run the v0 version in here but with your version it ran smoothly.
Cheers,
Andre
I just wanted to thank you for sharing your easygrid_v2. I was having a lot of problems trying to run the v0 version in here but with your version it ran smoothly.
Cheers,
Andre