That is the version we had problems with before (see earlier in the thread). The answer still is to upgrade your compiler.
Good luck,
Steve
Search found 11 matches
- Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:51 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
- Replies: 11
- Views: 12343
- Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:14 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
- Replies: 11
- Views: 12343
Re: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurr
What compiler and version are you using? Upgrading to a newer version of the compiler allowed it to work for us previously. It would be good to know what compiler version you are using to know which versions to avoid.
- Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:44 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
- Replies: 11
- Views: 12343
Re: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurr
Just to close this up, Intel Composer XE 2011 SP1 9.293 is working as expected.
- Tue Apr 03, 2012 2:15 am
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
- Replies: 11
- Views: 12343
Re: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurr
Bizarre. We've had no problem with earlier versions of ROMS (at least a year old) and this compiler,
Thanks for the confirmation.
Steve
Thanks for the confirmation.
Steve
- Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:09 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
- Replies: 11
- Views: 12343
Re: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurr
Did you ever figure out what this was? I'm getting the same thing now from a recent (608) download using SVN. Using USE_DEBUG allows it to work. Running it without USE_DEBUG but adding -g -traceback (Intel compiler 11.1) in FFLAGS yielded:
NL ROMS/TOMS: started time-stepping: (Grid: 01 TimeSteps ...
NL ROMS/TOMS: started time-stepping: (Grid: 01 TimeSteps ...
- Fri Aug 18, 2006 4:04 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: How can we make the ROMS forum more active?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4845
- Tue Aug 15, 2006 4:17 pm
- Forum: ROMS Bugs
- Topic: ROMS 2.2 problem when USWEST is defined
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3223
ROMS 2.2 problem when USWEST is defined
After downloading the ROMS code with the corrections I made two changes:
1. cppdefs.h: undefined UPWELLING and defined USWEST
2. makefile: changed compiler to ifort
ran make:
... yada, yada, yada...
/usr/bin/cpp -P -traditional -I/opt/intelsoft/netcdf/include -DLINUX -DX86_64 -DIFORT -IInclude ...
1. cppdefs.h: undefined UPWELLING and defined USWEST
2. makefile: changed compiler to ifort
ran make:
... yada, yada, yada...
/usr/bin/cpp -P -traditional -I/opt/intelsoft/netcdf/include -DLINUX -DX86_64 -DIFORT -IInclude ...
- Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:10 pm
- Forum: ROMS Installation
- Topic: OSX with xlf tweaks
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2403
OSX with xlf tweaks
I've just gone through the process of setting up ROMS 2.2 on a Mac OSX cluster running the IBM xlf compiler and I have a couple of tweaks to hopefully make it easier for others in the future.
1. the xlf compiler uses flush_ instead of flush. Utility/mp_routines.F checks #ifdef AIX for this but it ...
1. the xlf compiler uses flush_ instead of flush. Utility/mp_routines.F checks #ifdef AIX for this but it ...
- Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:59 pm
- Forum: ROMS Problems
- Topic: running ROMS on an OSX cluster
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8941
Re: running ROMS on an OSX cluster
We have been successful in running
One other problem you will find is segmentation faults for large models using LMD modules. The LMD modules allocate local 3-D arrays on the stack. The stack size support in Mac OS X is limited to 64MB using the shell's limit command.
To workaround this ...
One other problem you will find is segmentation faults for large models using LMD modules. The LMD modules allocate local 3-D arrays on the stack. The stack size support in Mac OS X is limited to 64MB using the shell's limit command.
To workaround this ...
- Mon May 02, 2005 10:14 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: Interconnect speed for MPI: Gigabit, Myrinet and Infiniband
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12195
Re: Gigabit vs. Infiniband on the BENCHMARK1 test
However, I thought it would be of interest to point out that the BENCHMARK1 ROMS test case has been run on dual-Opteron 250 clusters with both INFINIBAND and GIGABIT. For an 8 processor run, the system with INFINIBAND was 2.73 times faster than the system with GIGABIT .
Was the Gigabit run ...
Was the Gigabit run ...
- Wed Apr 20, 2005 4:32 pm
- Forum: ROMS Discussion
- Topic: ROMS with Mac cluster?
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2465
ROMS with Mac cluster?
Has anyone had success with ROMS on a Mac G5 cluster running either OSX or Linux? We (will) have access to a cluster that is set up to run either operating system and use the IBM Fortran compilers. We don't actually have access to the cluster yet so we can't give it a try. Just curious if anyone has ...